Memphis Zoning Watch

PD 06-368

Planned Development

A major modification to the Memphis Theological Seminary Planned Development (P.D. 06-368) to allow for the development of a chapel at the SW corner of Union Avenue and St. Agnes and to approve the Final Site Plan for Phase 2.

AI-generatedPlain-English summary — always check the source document.

The applicant wants to modify an existing planned development to add a chapel at the corner of Union Avenue and St. Agnes, and to finalize site plans for Phase 2 of the Memphis Theological Seminary campus.

Read the staff report this summary came from

Case details

Location
184 East Parkway (Southeast corner of Union Avenue and E. Parkway)
Jurisdiction
City of Memphis
Applicant / owner
Memphis Theological Seminary of The Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Next step if approved
Proceeds to the Memphis City Council.

Location

This case gives no address, so it can’t be tied to a parcel. The shaded area is where the record’s description puts it — near UNION AVE & E PARKWAY S, MEMPHIS, TN, 38104. Treat it as a neighbourhood, not an address.

Case history

  1. January 11, 2018

    Land Use Control Board — held case

    Staff recommendation: Approval

    Note: this case was held by the Board for a period of one month during its October 12, November 9 and December 14 meetings; it cannot be held again

    Source document

  2. December 14, 2017

    Land Use Control Board — held case

    Staff recommendation: Hold

    for one month. Note: this case was held by the Board for a period of one month during its October 12 meeting and then again for a period of one month during its November 9 meeting. This is the last hold

    Source document

  3. November 9, 2017

    Land Use Control Board — held case

    Staff recommendation: Hold

    (this case was held by the Board for a period of one month during its October 12 meeting)

    Source document

  4. October 12, 2017

    Land Use Control Board — new case

    Staff recommendation: Hold

    Source document

Sources

Every case detail on this page — dates, districts, parcels, staff recommendations — is read directly from the public documents below. The only exception is the summary at the top, which is AI-generated and labelled as such.

Something here look wrong? Report an error on this page.